Posted on Wed, Nov. 10, 2004

 

 

 

Study: Mine inspectors too 'nit-picky'


FOCUS SHOULD BE ON LARGER SAFETY ISSUES, REPORT SAYS



THE CHARLESTON (W.VA.) GAZETTE

Federal mine inspections miss "systematic" safety problems that cause accidents and fatalities, according to a year-old study by a government consultant.

U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration officials spend too much time on what industry critics call "nit-picky" citations and not enough on larger safety concerns, according to the study.

On Monday, MSHA officials released the September 2003 study by ICF Consulting of Fairfax, Va.

MSHA paid the industry consulting firm more than $400,000 to study ways that the agency could better focus -- and in some cases reduce -- its inspections of the nation's mines.

For more than a year, MSHA would not provide Joe Main, top safety officer for the United Mine Workers union, with any information about the ICF study.

In mid-October, MSHA did release some government records that outlined the purposes of the ICF review, including one that suggested the consultant would look for ways to reduce inspections at mines with good safety records.

MSHA officials released the complete ICF report, and posted it on the agency Web site -- www.msha.gov -- only after The Charleston Gazette filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the document.

Suzy Bohnert, a press spokeswoman for MSHA, declined to make any agency officials available for interviews about the ICF report.

In a prepared statement Monday, MSHA chief Dave Lauriski said the agency is still reviewing the year-old report.

"This third-party review is just one of the many tools we at MSHA are using in our ongoing evaluations of agency operations," Lauriski said in the statement. "The study took a fresh look at how to enhance mine safety, and we may not find every recommendation to be useful."

In its report, ICF found that MSHA generally accomplishes the legal requirement that it inspect all underground mines four times a year and all surface mines twice a year.

However, ICF said it was unable to correlate the types of injuries with the types of citations from MSHA.

"This suggests that at least some factors contributing to the current incident rates are not being captured in the process of issuing citations," the ICF report said.

ICF said it found that the numbers of citations and serious citations issued during MSHA inspections have not decreased over the past five years.

"One might have expected that, over time, actions by the mines to correct the cited violations would lead to a decrease in citations," the report said.

"This expectation is not supported by the data, which suggests that mine operators may be addressing only the specific symptomatic non-compliance cited and not correcting the underlying systematic causes," the ICF report said.

In his statement, Lauriski said MSHA is taking a "comprehensive look" to "figure out how to get to the next level in mine safety -- zero mining fatalities, injuries and illnesses."

The ICF report, however, suggested the agency is still far from meeting lesser goals that Lauriski himself set for the industry.

Lauriski set his goals as reducing fatality rates by 15 percent a year and reducing the all-injury rate by 50 percent by the end of 2005 compared with the fiscal year 2000 baseline.

ICF projected that "times for reaching a 15 percent reduction in fatalities is 4.7 years and for a 50 percent reduction in total injuries is 12 years."

In Kentucky, there have been four mine fatalities so far this year. There were eight mining deaths in Kentucky in 2003. There were 29 coal-mining deaths nationwide last year.

 

(Click here to read the full ICF Consulting Report)