A Short Lesson in LAW and Citations

This Non-S&S citation has the inspector leaping from an "Unlikely Occurrence" to a "Fatal Injury" because a label had weathered off the equipment. LAW-trained people would ask him for proof of his assumption of death. The Constitution of the US, Bill of Rights, Amendments I & IV require such to be "by Oath or affirmation". This guess on the inspectors part is not supported by either.

MSHA Policy Manual, Vol. I, page 21, "the Secretary of Labor must prove." This is a Constitutional Right! The agency must prove you wrong. You do not have to prove that you are right!

Citations must be examined closely to ascertain that they are legitimate when compared to the Constitutional and Legal requirements which the inspector must meet to ensure that the citation is legitimate. Part of this requirement is found in THE ACT Sec. 104(a). "Each citation shall be in writing and shall describe with particularity the nature of the violation, including a reference to the provision of the Act, standard, rule, regulation, or order alleged to have been violated."

Particularity means exactness. This narrative does not meet that. There is no support given for the inspector's hypothetical fatality or Negligence!

Fine based on March 2008 Penalty Table for this small solely-owned operation - $17,301.00

Training your people will not cost anywhere near that much and is the most effective defense against being put out of business for questionable non-compliance enforcement!

To register for the Feb. 8-12, 2010 MS&H LAW Institute Click:

HOME